EvF lumiblock consistency cross-check #4399
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
*check that LS is consistent with the one coming from information shared among multiple CMSSW processes *add several info logs to verify what was written in the lock file
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smorovic (Srecko Morovic) for CMSSW_7_2_X. EvF lumiblock consistency cross-check It involves the following packages: EventFilter/Utilities @mommsen, @cmsbuild, @Degano, @emeschi, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
+1 |
davidlange6
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2014
EvF lumiblock consistency cross-check (backport of #4399)
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. |
davidlange6
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2014
EvF lumiblock consistency cross-check
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DAQ bugfix that we will also ask to backport for 7_1_1:
*revert removing check for json file after EoLS has appeared
*check that LS is consistent with the one coming from information shared among multiple CMSSW processes
*add several info logs to verify what was written in the lock file